Understand the requirement, then find what supports it. The school judgement follows an evidence review.
Jump to any part of this standard
Strengths and growth areas use reviewed findings and professional judgement. Action, impact and review notes here are drafts saved in this browser. Use the Improvement pages to manage and review school records. Open improvement review →
School judgementNot assessed
School evidence0 real evidence mapped · Triangulation 0/3
Review & challengeDraft
Improvement0 growth areas
FROM THE OFFICIAL HANDBOOK
Official QNSA requirement
Read-only
Official standard5.3.2
Emergency/ Crisis Management & Training.
Focus areas
Safety and security policy/ plans and procedure (eg Covid, crisis, emergencies).
Training students and staff on mock evacuations.
The emergency exits are open and clear.
The assembly points are clear.
Clearly display evacuation plans throughout the school.
Distribution and maintenance of fire extinguishers periodically and regularly.
Maintaining records and lists of regular maintenance.
Suggested evidence
Safety and security policy and plans.
Maintenance records
Maintenance and safety contracts with outside companies.
Mock evacuation reports
Civil Defense license.
Evidence of training (photos, presentations...).
Survey results (feeling safe at school).
direct observation.
Interviews.
Self-reflection
How does the school provide training workshops on safety and precautionary measures?
How often does training on the mock evacuation procedures take place per year? How long did the last mock evacuation take? Is there any improvement in the speed / duration of evacuating the school building and its method?
Official rubric
4
Highly Effective
Varied and comprehensive safety and security plans are in place to ensure security and safety measures are exercised throughout school facilities. Students and staff are regularly trained on mock evacuations (at least twice a term). There are sufficient and clear emergency exits and assembly points ensuring safety throughout all school facilities.
Civil defense license is valid and sufficient. Fire extinguishers are distributed and regularly maintained throughout all of the school’s facilities.
3
Effective
Varied safety and security plans are in place to ensure security and safety measures are exercised throughout school facilities. Students and staff are regularly trained on mock evacuations (at least once a term). There are sufficient and clear emergency exits and assembly points ensuring safety throughout most school facilities.
Civil defense license is valid and fire extinguishers are distributed and regularly maintained throughout most school facilities.
2
Somewhat Effective
The school has some security and safety measures that are exercised throughout the school facilities. Training on mock evacuations is not regular. Emergency exits and assembly points are clear throughout some school facilities.
Civil defense license is under process and fire extinguishers are distributed and throughout some school facilities.
1
Ineffective
The school has limited/ineffectiv e security and safety measures which may compromise its safety. Students and staff are NOT trained on mock evacuations. Emergency exits and assembly points are unclear throughout the school facilities.
Fire extinguishers are insufficient and/or expired and Civil Defense license is not valid.
Focus source: 167, 168Rubric source: 170, 171
OUR SCHOOL’S WORK
School response
Human-owned judgement
01
School evidence
Choose evidence that shows what the school does. The same evidence can support more than one standard without uploading the file again.
Reading existing governed sources; no second evidence database is created.
02
What the evidence shows
What does the evidence tell us? Record each finding clearly, connect it to supporting evidence, then submit it for review.
Loading governed reflection and findings…
This layer interprets evidence; it never changes official QNSA text.
03
School judgement
Compare the reviewed findings with the QNSA rubric. A responsible person chooses the judgement and explains why; the system does not choose it automatically.
Loading professional judgement…
Judgement is human-owned and grounded in governed findings plus the official QNSA rubric.
04
Strengths · Growth areas
What should we keep doing? What needs to improve? Use the findings and judgement, then ask for each point to be reviewed.
Loading strengths and growth areas…
This layer is grounded in professional judgement and governed findings.
05
Improvement action · Impact
Convert standard gaps into trackable actions, then record implementation impact.
Improvement action
No actions linked yet.
Impact
Impact not yet evidencedRecord impact only when a change for learners can be supported by evidence.
06
Review & challenge
The reviewer challenges the quality of reasoning; the system never issues an accreditation judgement automatically.
07
History
The standard becomes an improvement story, not a static snapshot.