Cleanliness, and maintenance throughout all of the school’s facilities and equipment are well maintained, and checked up effectively on a regular basis.
Lighting and ventilation are appropriate throughout all of the school’s facilities.
Resources Management · Physical Resources
Understand the requirement, then find what supports it. The school judgement follows an evidence review.
Maintenance and upkeep of school facilities and resources.
Cleanliness, and maintenance throughout all of the school’s facilities and equipment are well maintained, and checked up effectively on a regular basis.
Lighting and ventilation are appropriate throughout all of the school’s facilities.
Cleanliness, and maintenance throughout most of the school’s facilities and equipment are well maintained, and checked up on regularly.
Lighting and ventilation are appropriate throughout most of the school’s facilities.
Cleanliness, and maintenance throughout some of the school’s facilities and equipment are maintained.
Lighting and ventilation are appropriate throughout some of the school’s facilities.
Most of the school’s facilities/ equipment are minimally taken care of.
Lighting and ventilation are not suitable throughout most of the school’s facilities.
Choose evidence that shows what the school does. The same evidence can support more than one standard without uploading the file again.
Reading existing governed sources; no second evidence database is created.
What does the evidence tell us? Record each finding clearly, connect it to supporting evidence, then submit it for review.
This layer interprets evidence; it never changes official QNSA text.
Compare the reviewed findings with the QNSA rubric. A responsible person chooses the judgement and explains why; the system does not choose it automatically.
Judgement is human-owned and grounded in governed findings plus the official QNSA rubric.
What should we keep doing? What needs to improve? Use the findings and judgement, then ask for each point to be reviewed.
This layer is grounded in professional judgement and governed findings.
Convert standard gaps into trackable actions, then record implementation impact.
No actions linked yet.
The reviewer challenges the quality of reasoning; the system never issues an accreditation judgement automatically.
The standard becomes an improvement story, not a static snapshot.
No history yet.