Resources Management · Physical Resources
Understand the requirement, then find what supports it. The school judgement follows an evidence review.
Library resources and utilization.
Library resources (books, computers, materials, internet) are sufficient, suitable, effective, and varied and aligned with the applied curricula (international and MOEHE), resulting in regular and effective benefit of almost all students from library resources and activities and catering to their needs. A school librarian actively facilitates students’ learning in the library.
Library resources (books, computers, materials, internet) are sufficient, suitable and varied and aligned with the applied curricula (international and MOEHE), resulting in the regular benefit of most students from library resources and activities and catering to their needs. A school librarian facilitates students’ learning in the library.
Library resources (books, computers, materials, internet). are aligned with the applied curricula (international and MOEHE), resulting in the benefit of some students from library resources and activities and catering to their needs. An employee is in charge of library responsibilities.
Library resources limitedly commensurate with the curriculum, educational programs and students’ numbers. OR
There is no school library(portable library/ in-class library), and no dedicated staff member for the library.
Choose evidence that shows what the school does. The same evidence can support more than one standard without uploading the file again.
Reading existing governed sources; no second evidence database is created.
What does the evidence tell us? Record each finding clearly, connect it to supporting evidence, then submit it for review.
This layer interprets evidence; it never changes official QNSA text.
Compare the reviewed findings with the QNSA rubric. A responsible person chooses the judgement and explains why; the system does not choose it automatically.
Judgement is human-owned and grounded in governed findings plus the official QNSA rubric.
What should we keep doing? What needs to improve? Use the findings and judgement, then ask for each point to be reviewed.
This layer is grounded in professional judgement and governed findings.
Convert standard gaps into trackable actions, then record implementation impact.
No actions linked yet.
The reviewer challenges the quality of reasoning; the system never issues an accreditation judgement automatically.
The standard becomes an improvement story, not a static snapshot.
No history yet.