Technological aids are effectively and regularly used to support teaching and learning and meet curricular objectives in varied subject areas and support almost all students’ learning.
Technology utilization in learning.
Educational Performance & Learning Environment · Quality of Learning
How do I work on this standard?
Understand the requirement, then find what supports it. The school judgement follows an evidence review.
Jump to any part of this standard
Official QNSA requirement
Technology utilization in learning.
Focus areas
- Utilization of technological equipment and tools to support the achievement of lesson objectives (including in the library and school laboratories).
- Encouraging use of technology for the active participation and motivation of students in different classes.
- Students' development of modern and varied technological skills (communication and research skills, etc.).
- Use of technology makes it easier to present ideas and save class time.
- The use of technology is reflected in students' work (including projects, research, and communications).
Suggested evidence
- Lesson plans.
- Class observations
- Learning resources including specific technological tools and equipment to support learning.
- Class activities.
- Sample student work.
- Surveys.
Self-reflection
- To what extent are technological tools included in all lessons? How effective is it and how does it impact student learning? How does the school ensure this?
Official rubric
Technological aids are regularly used to support teaching and learning and meet curricular objectives in varied subject areas and support most students’ learning.
Technological aids are used to support teaching and learning and meet curricular objectives in some subject areas, and support some students’ learning.
Technological aids are limitedly used to support teaching and learning.
School response
School evidence
Choose evidence that shows what the school does. The same evidence can support more than one standard without uploading the file again.
Reading existing governed sources; no second evidence database is created.
What the evidence shows
What does the evidence tell us? Record each finding clearly, connect it to supporting evidence, then submit it for review.
This layer interprets evidence; it never changes official QNSA text.
School judgement
Compare the reviewed findings with the QNSA rubric. A responsible person chooses the judgement and explains why; the system does not choose it automatically.
Judgement is human-owned and grounded in governed findings plus the official QNSA rubric.
Strengths · Growth areas
What should we keep doing? What needs to improve? Use the findings and judgement, then ask for each point to be reviewed.
This layer is grounded in professional judgement and governed findings.
Improvement action · Impact
Convert standard gaps into trackable actions, then record implementation impact.
Improvement action
No actions linked yet.
Impact
Review & challenge
The reviewer challenges the quality of reasoning; the system never issues an accreditation judgement automatically.
History
The standard becomes an improvement story, not a static snapshot.
No history yet.