Skip to content
Official QNSA standard
3.2.2

Differentiated instruction.

Educational Performance & Learning Environment · Quality of Learning

ONE CLEAR STEP AT A TIME

How do I work on this standard?

Understand the requirement, then find what supports it. The school judgement follows an evidence review.

Jump to any part of this standard
Strengths and growth areas use reviewed findings and professional judgement. Action, impact and review notes here are drafts saved in this browser. Use the Improvement pages to manage and review school records. Open improvement review →
FROM THE OFFICIAL HANDBOOK

Official QNSA requirement

Read-only
Official standard3.2.2

Differentiated instruction.

Focus areas
  • Teaching methods are varied, and different groups of students can achieve the goals of the lessons such as gradual explanation, working in groups, individual assistance, taking into account different learning styles (visual, auditory, sensory).
  • Lesson plans include varied methods of dealing with different groups of students.
  • Activities, worksheets, and other assessment techniques that take into account individual differences amongst students.
  • Distribution of students into groups according to their levels.
Suggested evidence
  • Lesson plans.
  • Class observations
  • Learning resources.
  • Class activities.
  • Worksheets.
  • Sample student work.
  • Surveys.
Self-reflection
  • To what extent are teaching strategies and classroom activities implemented to meet the different needs of students during lessons? How does this improve their outcomes during lessons? How is this monitored? What evidence supports this?
Official rubric
4
Highly Effective

Differentiated teaching methods and classroom activities are diversified (individual, pair, and group work) and effectively cater to almost all students’ learning needs.

3
Effective

Differentiated teaching methods and classroom activities are diversified (individual, pair and group work) and cater to most students’ learning needs.

2
Somewhat Effective

Inconsistent differentiated teaching methods and classroom activities are sometimes adopted and cater to some students’ learning needs.

1
Ineffective

Differentiated teaching methods and classroom activities limitedly cater to students’ learning needs.

Focus source: 93, 94Rubric source: 100
OUR SCHOOL’S WORK

School response

Human-owned judgement
01

School evidence

Choose evidence that shows what the school does. The same evidence can support more than one standard without uploading the file again.

Loading real KCD evidence…

Reading existing governed sources; no second evidence database is created.

02

What the evidence shows

What does the evidence tell us? Record each finding clearly, connect it to supporting evidence, then submit it for review.

Loading governed reflection and findings…

This layer interprets evidence; it never changes official QNSA text.

03

School judgement

Compare the reviewed findings with the QNSA rubric. A responsible person chooses the judgement and explains why; the system does not choose it automatically.

Loading professional judgement…

Judgement is human-owned and grounded in governed findings plus the official QNSA rubric.

04

Strengths · Growth areas

What should we keep doing? What needs to improve? Use the findings and judgement, then ask for each point to be reviewed.

Loading strengths and growth areas…

This layer is grounded in professional judgement and governed findings.

05

Improvement action · Impact

Convert standard gaps into trackable actions, then record implementation impact.

Improvement action

No actions linked yet.

Impact

Impact not yet evidencedRecord impact only when a change for learners can be supported by evidence.
06

Review & challenge

The reviewer challenges the quality of reasoning; the system never issues an accreditation judgement automatically.

07

History

The standard becomes an improvement story, not a static snapshot.

No history yet.