Skip to content
Official QNSA standard
2.3.3

Follow up and Evaluation of School Plans, Programs, and Projects.

Educational Leadership · School Quality Assurance & Performance Effectiveness

ONE CLEAR STEP AT A TIME

How do I work on this standard?

Understand the requirement, then find what supports it. The school judgement follows an evidence review.

Jump to any part of this standard
Strengths and growth areas use reviewed findings and professional judgement. Action, impact and review notes here are drafts saved in this browser. Use the Improvement pages to manage and review school records. Open improvement review →
FROM THE OFFICIAL HANDBOOK

Official QNSA requirement

Read-only
Official standard2.3.3

Follow up and Evaluation of School Plans, Programs, and Projects.

Focus areas
  • Internal quality assurance mechanisms to follow up and evaluate plans, programs, and projects.
  • Evaluating impact and effectiveness of programs and projects to improve students' outcomes (academic and behaviors, and other school aspects.
Suggested evidence
  • Examples of follow up methods. (Internal quality assurance system including school’s own follow-up reports, benchmarks and monitoring tools, class observations, and follow-up of plans and projects)
  • School plans: strategic, executive, emergency, educational, remedial, enrichment plans,...
  • Minutes of meetings
  • Related reports
  • Interviews.
  • Survey results.
  • Direct observation.
Self-reflection
  • What are the school’s mechanisms to follow up and evaluate plans and programs? What evidences are there to ensure effectiveness?
Official rubric
4
Highly Effective

The school conducts continuous and effective evaluation of all plans, programs, and projects using specific criteria/benchma rks, resulting in impactful modifications based on the school's priorities and identified needs.

3
Effective

The school conducts continuous and effective evaluation of most plans, programs, and projects using specific criteria/benchmar ks, resulting in appropriate modifications based on the school's priorities and identified needs.

2
Somewhat Effective

The school conducts evaluation of some plans and programs resulting in some modifications on school needs.

1
Ineffective

The school conducts limited evaluation of plans and programs, Or

Unclear mechanism to evaluate school plans, programs, and projects.

Focus source: 75Rubric source: 77
OUR SCHOOL’S WORK

School response

Human-owned judgement
01

School evidence

Choose evidence that shows what the school does. The same evidence can support more than one standard without uploading the file again.

Loading real KCD evidence…

Reading existing governed sources; no second evidence database is created.

02

What the evidence shows

What does the evidence tell us? Record each finding clearly, connect it to supporting evidence, then submit it for review.

Loading governed reflection and findings…

This layer interprets evidence; it never changes official QNSA text.

03

School judgement

Compare the reviewed findings with the QNSA rubric. A responsible person chooses the judgement and explains why; the system does not choose it automatically.

Loading professional judgement…

Judgement is human-owned and grounded in governed findings plus the official QNSA rubric.

04

Strengths · Growth areas

What should we keep doing? What needs to improve? Use the findings and judgement, then ask for each point to be reviewed.

Loading strengths and growth areas…

This layer is grounded in professional judgement and governed findings.

05

Improvement action · Impact

Convert standard gaps into trackable actions, then record implementation impact.

Improvement action

No actions linked yet.

Impact

Impact not yet evidencedRecord impact only when a change for learners can be supported by evidence.
06

Review & challenge

The reviewer challenges the quality of reasoning; the system never issues an accreditation judgement automatically.

07

History

The standard becomes an improvement story, not a static snapshot.

No history yet.